本帖最后由 刘颖 于 2017-4-23 00:41 编辑
WASHINGTON, D.C.
What are editorial pages saying?
The marches haven’t started yet, but editorial page writersaround the world are already weighing in. Here’s a small sampling of opinions:
The Washington Post argues that “The March for Science couldsave lives” by reminding the public of the importance of research to fightdiseases such as Ebola. But it urges marchers to remember that winning sciencefunding battles can mean plunging into politics. “Many of those organizing andparticipating in the March for Science say it is a statement of belief in thepower of empirical discovery, and not an anti-Trump protest,” the Posteditorial notes. “It is fine to remain nonpartisan, but that should not meanbeing blissfully ignorant of the realities of politics. The battles to come inWashington over spending priorities could determine whether the United Stateswill remain a global leader in scientific research.”
In Australia, the Sydney Morning Herald notes that“Australians are not used to scientists and engineers being public figures.”Still, it “welcomes this public expression of support for science andrationality. However, we worry that displays of hubris or overt attempts topoliticise the debate for narrow self-interest could cause a backlash among thevery people the organisers claim to be speaking to: members of the public whodo not trust science.”
At Cleveland.com, a roundtable of editorial writers wasgenerally supportive of the march. But Ted Diadiun, one editorial board member,took a dim view. “A grandstand play, put on by people who don’t like Trump orthe GOP, regardless, that has nothing to do with climate change, alternativefuels or any other science. These folks ought to put their pocket protectorsback in their short-sleeved dress shirts and get back into the labs where theybelong.”
The Independent, which serves Livermore, California—home tothe Department of Energy’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -- notes that“science plays a large role in the economy of the area” and is urging localscientists to “take a stand in favor of research; take part in the march.” --David Malakoff |